|
31st October 2007, 04:46 PM | #1 |
Member
Expert member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 72
|
Re: Extend surface to intersect another surface.....
luucky - no joy unfortunately, the plugin has its uses but not here....
coldby - That is my usual method for intersecting complex objects in order to make neat joints. The boolean ops don't work on these structures very well (if at all....). The knifing can only effectively be done by dividing the surfaces of the objects a great deal - this wastes allot of time clearing up the excessive numbers of surfaces. I was just hoping for a great deal quicker 'included' method, one that I quite like is included in solid edges 3d modeller.... I think things could be better if boolean operations were not required to be made from solids. coanda |
1st November 2007, 03:15 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Professional user
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 917
|
Re: Extend surface to intersect another surface.....
|
2nd November 2007, 04:30 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Professional user
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 102
|
Re: Extend surface to intersect another surface.....
coanda:
there must be a Poltergeist or three in the booleans of AC3D: sometimes they perform quite OK, other times you have to darn a few stray vertices and surfaces but the result is still usable, every now and then you'll better find an alternate way if you want to retain a modicum of sanity. Even more disconcerting, they appear to work somewhat better in my office (on an old piece of crap under Win2000) than at home (on a brand new 2.2GHz dual core under WinXP) - and don't ask if it's because of the operating system or the hardware crapness for I haven't the slightest idea. I already pestered poor Andy on the matter and I guess he's now quite fed up with me and my boolean obsessions lisa: forget about the old booleans, I've been trying to use them for nearly one year without being able to squeeze anything really reasonable out of them However Dennis' good ol' knife works all right and is a fine tool if I ever saw one. |
2nd November 2007, 03:33 PM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Professional user
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: France
Posts: 737
|
Re: Extend surface to intersect another surface.....
Quote:
I did make a small test on my side the other day, and it worked (again in the way I thought it was supposed to). It might or not help you, but when moving toward surfaces, I found that these surfaces have to be planar, otherwise the result isn't correct. Good luck !
__________________
OL. |
|
2nd November 2007, 07:50 PM | #5 |
Member
Expert member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 72
|
Re: Extend surface to intersect another surface.....
Thats pretty much it luucky - the point moved to for a surface is not the actual projected interception of the 'subject' surface onto the 'target' surface if that makes any sense....the good thing is, is that its another tool in the 'ol box....
coldby - yeah, sometimes you get sensible answers and sometimes you don't....sometimes it spits back errors related to the fact that the operation only works with solids (when I mainly use extruded surfaces) which is my main problem. I have to say that I avoid boolean operations whereever possible, as the answer they produce really don't make much sense and require allot of cleaning up, so I try to design around that particular limitation. Bit of a let down in what is an otherwise brilliant program. Cheers Coanda |
6th November 2007, 05:48 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Professional user
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 102
|
More misteries
Hi coanda,
<sometimes it spits back errors related to the fact that the operation only works with solids (when I mainly use extruded surfaces)> Why the hell do booleans work (though imperfectly) with extruded surfaces too, at least on my office computer??? I haven't dreamt of it, I just checked a few minutes ago: extruded surface [do not remove original - cap end]; cube off-the-shelf; boolean subtract [surface - cube]; result: impeccable (!) Second try: other extruded and capped surface subtracted from previous result; outcome acceptable if not perfect (just one misplaced vertex). What do you think, shall I start looking for a three-legged table? Cheers coldby |
6th November 2007, 03:03 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Professional user
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 917
|
Re: Extend surface to intersect another surface.....
Maybe you have different versions of the plug-in on your computers?
|
7th November 2007, 03:32 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Professional user
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 102
|
Poltergeists
Mmh, hardly: every time a new version appears I use to re-install the whole lot on both machines, plugins included. And since a few versions the booleans aren't a plug-in anymore. And as a physicist I'm pretty sceptical about supernatural manifestations. Still, it keeps happening.
Must be some devious Windows alchemy, but I'll be damned if I have the faintest hint about what it can be. Would any Mac user contribute his own share of experience on this messy subject? |
15th November 2007, 05:49 PM | #9 |
Member
Expert member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 72
|
Re: Poltergeists
I think you can buy 3 legged tables (which are perfectly stable when used in the right way!) - you have to screw them to the wall tho....
You may be a physicist, and I may be a structural engineer - but that doesn't mean that we can't use AC3D in different ways. Using the boolean operation on 2 extruded surfaces always brings me pain. It can work with extruded surfaces and solids - but thats not how I'm using it. Coanda |
|
|